1920-011 Handbook Changes

Full Name
Corey Martell
Email address
cmartell@mxcc.edu
Phone Number
860-343-5701
Role at MxCC
·         Management
Submitted on behalf of:
Self
Proposal Title
Title Changes in the Governance Handbook
Proposal Type
Request for Action (obtain approval)
Proposal Description/Rationale
Given the reorganization of Middlesex Community College, I am submitting this proposal
to address title changes in the MxCC Shared Governance Handbook. I used track
changes to show the proposed changes in the attached document.
Does this proposal have campus-wide implications? If yes, how so? If not a campus-wide concern, you may want to refer this issue to your supervisor
Yes, because the shared governance model affects all members of the Middlesex
Community College community.
Does this proposal address a strategic priority of the college? If so, describe.
N/A
Does this proposal have budgetary implications? If so, describe projected costs and funding sources.
NO
Is this proposal time sensitive? If so, describe the timeframe for implementation.
Yes. It is important changes are made to the handbook in order to reflect the College’s
current organizational structure.
What governing body at MxCC do you feel would be most appropriate to address your interests?
·         Academic Assembly

·         Administrative Assembly

·         Student Services Assembly

·         Executive Council

Recorder Review

Date: 10/23/19

Recorder: Corey Martell

Action:

XSubmitted to governing body (list body): All Assemblies
 Returned to Originator for revision
 Forward for action by (list department/employee):
 Other:

Comments/Rationale:

 

Committee Review

Committee:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Assembly Review:

Assembly:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Executive Council Review

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable  (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

President’s Decision

Date:

Recorder:

 Approved
 Modified
 Not Approved
 Returned for Revision
 Not Applicable

Comments/Rationale:

Implementation Plan/Timeline:

 

Implementation (Curriculum/Program Proposals)

ACTIONCOMPLETED BYDATE COMPLETED
Signature Form Filed (Dean)  
Documents Uploaded to P:\Drive  
Registrar/Banner entry  
Catalog Entry  
Other