1718-022 Bylaws/HB

First Name:Corey
Last Name:Martell
Email addresscmartell@mxcc.edu
Phone Number:8603435701
Role at MxCCManagement
Submitted on behalf of:Governance Evaluation Committee
Proposal TitleShared Governance Bylaws and Handbook
Proposal TypeRequest for Input (obtain feedback/input
Proposal Description/RationaleThe Governance Evaluation Committee and FIO Partners have prepared draft shared governance bylaws and handbook for review and input from each Assembly.
Does this proposal have campus-wide implications? If yes, how so? If not a campus-wide concern, you may want to refer this issue to your supervisorYes. The bylaws and handbooks will be the guiding documents for MxCC’s shared governance model.
Does this proposal address a strategic priority of the college? If so, describe.This proposal addresses goal three of the current strategic plan.
Does this proposal have budgetary implications? If so, describe projected costs and funding sources.No.
Is this proposal time sensitive? If so, describe the timeframe for implementation.Yes. It is the goal of the Governance Evaluation Committee to have final bylaws and handbook in place for the Spring semester (feedback in November, final documents submitted for approval in December).
What governing body at MxCC do you feel would be most appropriate to address your interests?Academic Assembly
Administrative Assembly
Student Services Assembly

MxCC Draft Governance Bylaws 11-01-17

Draft Governance Handbook 11-01-17

Recorder Review

Date: 11/6/17

Recorder: Corey Martell

Action:

XSubmitted to governing body (list body): All Asssemblies
Returned to Originator for revision
Forward for action by (list department/employee):
Other:

Comments/Rationale:

 

Committee Review

Committee:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

support with no issues
further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
not supported
no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Assembly Review:

Assembly:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

support with no issues
further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
not supported
no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Executive Council Review

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

support with no issues
further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
not supported
no recommendation/not applicable  (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

President’s Decision

Date:

Recorder:

Approved
Modified
Not Approved
Returned for Revision
Not Applicable

Comments/Rationale:

Implementation Plan/Timeline:

 

Implementation (Curriculum/Program Proposals)

ACTIONCOMPLETED BYDATE COMPLETED
Signature Form Filed (Dean)
Documents Uploaded to P:\Drive
Registrar/Banner entry
Catalog Entry
Other