1718-030 Gov. Handbook

Full Name
Corey Martell
Email address
cmartell@mxcc.edu
Phone Number
860-343-5701
Role at MxCC
·         Management
Submitted on behalf of:
GEC
Proposal Title
Shared Governance Handbook
Proposal Type
Request for Action (obtain approval)
Proposal Description/Rationale
he NEASC accreditation report of 2013-14 identified governance as an area of particular concern at the college. A new governance model was created by a task force in summer 2015 to be piloted by the College. This model was also developed to address concerns about a lack of transparency, accountability, communication, and engagement repeatedly expressed by participants in recent years. Faculty and staff were given opportunities to provide feedback regarding this model. Changes were made to the Shared Governance Bylaws and Handbook based on faculty and staff feedback. We are asking each Assembly to vote on making the attached document MxCC’s official Shared Governance Handbook.
Does this proposal have campus-wide implications? If yes, how so? If not a campus-wide concern, you may want to refer this issue to your supervisor
Yes
Does this proposal address a strategic priority of the college? If so, describe.
Yes
Does this proposal have budgetary implications? If so, describe projected costs and funding sources.
Yes
Is this proposal time sensitive? If so, describe the timeframe for implementation.
Yes.
What governing body at MxCC do you feel would be most appropriate to address your interests?
·         Academic Assembly

·         Administrative Assembly

·         Student Services Assembly

 

Recorder Review

Date: 2/8/18

Recorder: Corey Martell

Action:

XSubmitted to governing body (list body): Curriculum Committee
Returned to Originator for revision
Forward for action by (list department/employee):
Other:

Comments/Rationale:

Governance Handbook – Final 02-05-18

Committee Review

Committee:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

support with no issues
further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
not supported
no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Assembly Review:

Assembly:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

support with no issues
further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
not supported
no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Executive Council Review

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

support with no issues
further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
not supported
no recommendation/not applicable  (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

President’s Decision

Date:

Recorder:

Approved
Modified
Not Approved
Returned for Revision
Not Applicable

Comments/Rationale:

Implementation Plan/Timeline:

 

Implementation (Curriculum/Program Proposals)

ACTIONCOMPLETED BYDATE COMPLETED
Signature Form Filed (Dean)
Documents Uploaded to P:\Drive
Registrar/Banner entry
Catalog Entry
Other