1819-002 Change to Bylaws

Full Name
Corey Martell
Email address
cmartell@mxcc.edu
Phone Number
8603435701
Role at MxCC
·         Management
Submitted on behalf of:
Myself
Proposal Title
Change In Article 6 of the Shared Governance Bylaws
Proposal Type
Request for Action (obtain approval)
Proposal Description/Rationale
After thoroughly reviewing the MxCC Governance Bylaws, I realized that there is a process outlined in the Bylaws for making changes to the Bylaws, however there is no process outlined for making changes to the MxCC Governance Handbook.

Article 6 of the Bylaws currently reads –
By-Law Approval and Changes
Approval and future revisions to these bylaws will require approval by a 2/3 majority of each Assembly and the Executive Council.

I plan to submit a proposal to change Article 6 to read –
By-Law and Handbook Approval and Changes
Approval and future revisions to the Middlesex Community College Bylaws of the College Governance System will require approval by a 2/3 majority of each Assembly and the Executive Council. Approval and future revision of the MxCC Shared Governance Handbook will require approval by a simple majority (>50%) of each Assembly and the Executive Council.

Does this proposal have campus-wide implications? If yes, how so? If not a campus-wide concern, you may want to refer this issue to your supervisor
Yes. This impacts the College’s Shared Governance Bylaws.
Does this proposal address a strategic priority of the college? If so, describe.
No.
Does this proposal have budgetary implications? If so, describe projected costs and funding sources.
No.
Is this proposal time sensitive? If so, describe the timeframe for implementation.
Yes. This change is necessary in order to propose changes to the handbook.
What governing body at MxCC do you feel would be most appropriate to address your interests?
·         Academic Assembly

·         Administrative Assembly

·         Student Services Assembly

·         Executive Council

Recorder Review

Date: 8/31/18

Recorder: Corey Martell

Action:

XSubmitted to governing body (list body): Academic Assembly, Student Services Assembly, Administrative Assembly
 Returned to Originator for revision
 Forward for action by (list department/employee):
 Other:

Comments/Rationale:

 

Committee Review

Committee:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Assembly Review:

Assembly:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Executive Council Review

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable  (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

President’s Decision

Date:

Recorder:

 Approved
 Modified
 Not Approved
 Returned for Revision
 Not Applicable

Comments/Rationale:

Implementation Plan/Timeline:

 

Implementation (Curriculum/Program Proposals)

ACTIONCOMPLETED BYDATE COMPLETED
Signature Form Filed (Dean)  
Documents Uploaded to P:\Drive  
Registrar/Banner entry  
Catalog Entry  
Other