1819-005 White Paper Input

Full Name
Corey Martell
Email address
cmartell@mxcc.edu
Phone Number
8603435701
Role at MxCC
·         Management
Submitted on behalf of:
Office of the Campus CEO
Proposal Title
White Paper Input
Proposal Type
Request for Input (obtain feedback/input
Proposal Description/Rationale
The CSCU is developing a white paper for the next Governor and new General Assembly. We have been invited to provide input. Please share and discuss the attached questions at your September meeting.
Does this proposal have campus-wide implications? If yes, how so? If not a campus-wide concern, you may want to refer this issue to your supervisor
Yes. This allows us the opportunity to share our vision and advocate for Middlesex Community College and our community with the new administration.
Does this proposal address a strategic priority of the college? If so, describe.
No
Does this proposal have budgetary implications? If so, describe projected costs and funding sources.
No.
Is this proposal time sensitive? If so, describe the timeframe for implementation.
Yes. All feedback must be submitted by October 5, 2018.
What governing body at MxCC do you feel would be most appropriate to address your interests?
·         Academic Assembly

·         Administrative Assembly

·         Student Services Assembly

Recorder Review

Date: 9/5/18

Recorder: Corey Martell

Action:

XSubmitted to governing body (list body): Curriculum Committee
 Returned to Originator for revision
 Forward for action by (list department/employee):
 Other:

Comments/Rationale:

White Paper Questions

Committee Review

Committee:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Assembly Review:

Assembly:

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

Executive Council Review

Meeting Date:

Recorder:

Action:

 support with no issues
 further development required (returned to originator(s) for further development)
 not supported
 no recommendation/not applicable  (explain below)

Comments/Rationale:

 

President’s Decision

Date:

Recorder:

 Approved
 Modified
 Not Approved
 Returned for Revision
 Not Applicable

Comments/Rationale:

Implementation Plan/Timeline:

 

Implementation (Curriculum/Program Proposals)

ACTIONCOMPLETED BYDATE COMPLETED
Signature Form Filed (Dean)  
Documents Uploaded to P:\Drive  
Registrar/Banner entry  
Catalog Entry  
Other